What is the significance of being a Primerus law firm?
Primerus is an international network of top-rated, independent,
law firms that have earned the right to display the Primerus
seal of quality. Candidates for membership must have
the maximum AV rating from Martindale-Hubbell, the peer
review rating source that lawyers use to find other lawyers.
Further, a law firm must submit to a rigorous evaluation
which includes candid assessments from judges, fellow
attorneys, current and former clients, bar associations,
and malpractice insurance carriers. Firms must also attest
to their commitment to the exacting standards of the
Six Pillars of Primerus Quality: Integrity, Excellent
Work Product, Reasonable Fees, Continuing Legal Education,
Civility, and Community Service. And it doesn't end there.
Primerus firms are audited annually to ensure that they
continue to be the "best of the best," year
after year.
What is the National Board of Trial Advocacy (NBTA)?
The National Board of Trial Advocacy (NBTA) is a non-profit
organization dedicated to bettering the quality of trial
advocacy in our nation's courtrooms and assisting the
consumer of legal services in finding experienced and
highly qualified trial lawyers. NBTA is accredited by
the American Bar Association (ABA) to certify lawyers
in the specialty areas of civil, criminal and family
law trial advocacy.
The standards are as follows:
- Good Standing: Applicants must be a member
of the bar in good standing. All applicants submit
a comprehensive
history of professional conduct and disclose any
disciplinary action, past or pending.
- Concentration in the Specialty of Trial Advocacy: A minimum of 30% concentration in the field in which
the attorney
seeks certification for at least the three years
immediately preceding application.
- Writing Sample: Submission of a writing sample in the form of a trial
brief, prepared by the applicant,
and submitted to a court of law within the three years immediately
preceding application for certification.
- Continuing
Legal Education: Participation in at least 45 hours
of continuing legal education in the
three years immediately preceding application. The educational seminars
must pertain to trial advocacy in the field
in which the attorney seeks certification.
- Judicial
and Attorney Peer Review: Provision of three judges
and three attorneys familiar with the
applicant's courtroom abilities.
- Trials: Lead counsel in a number of trials
to verdict or judgment and a sampling of other trial
and courtroom skills that are documented in checklist form.
- Lead Counsel in
Contested Matters: In addition to the trials, all
applicants must document lead
counsel in 40 contested matters involving the taking of evidence,
such as hearings, motions or depositions.
- Examination: Applicants must successfully pass the
NBTA examination which is an all essay, trial
techniques, evidence and ethics exam lasting six hours. The
exam is written and graded by trial lawyers and law professors.
The exam process is overseen by the
NBTA Examination Committee and Board of Examiners.
Once an attorney has met and documented
the standards for NBTA certification
Civil, Criminal,
or Family
Law, or Social Security Disability),
he or she remains an
active member for five years, subject
to annual reporting which continues
to meet
the requirements
of the Standards
Committee. Once the five year period
is completed, the member is required
to apply
for recertification. What does it mean to be AV-Rated?
For over a century, lawyers have relied on the Martindale
Hubbell Law Directory for authoritative information
on the worldwide legal profession. Martindale's Peer
Review Ratings play an integral role in this service
to the legal community.
Buyers of legal services, as well as those making referrals,
consider Peer Review Ratings invaluable when evaluating
a lawyer. Whether choosing between two equally qualified
candidates or looking for counsel in another jurisdiction,
lawyers and consumers need to have confidence in the
individual under consideration. Using Ratings, they
can select counsel with superior ethics, as well as the
desired
level of professional experience.
Peer Review Ratings attest to a lawyer's legal ability
and professional ethics, and reflect the confidential
opinions of members of the Bar and Judiciary.
The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings system,
which evaluates lawyers and law firms in the United
States
and Canada, is based on the confidential opinions of
members of the Bar and the Judiciary, including both
those who are rated and those who are not.
Martindale-Hubbell representatives conduct personal
interviews to discuss lawyers under review with other
members of
the Bar. A compilation of these opinions from various
sources is necessary to form a consensus, and lawyers
under review are sometimes asked to provide professional
references to assist with the process.
Cardelli, Lanfear & Buikema is an AV-rated firm,
the highest rating given by the Martindale-Hubbell Peer
Review Rating system.
|